Machievelli Biography Essay

Machiavelli lived during the Renaissance era of the mediaeval times. In this time period umteen concepts and melodic themes were existence reborn, including the Christian faith. He lived during a time period in which the spate of the time thought of the Black enkindle as a symptom of judicial decision upon the offendfulness of the land. These same nation began to pine away themselves in outrank to express their sorrow and so remove Gods judgment laid upon them. Although Machiavelli lived long by and by the fall of the Roman Empire, he lived in an Italy that had evolved into a war-torn battleground surrounded by the city state dynasties. There were conflicts between the French and Spanish for the control of land. Machiavelli lived in a time of growing policy-making powers and a Christian community that was adapting and ever-changing according to the claims of the Reformers. Machiavelli had a goal he sought to create a dichotomy between ethical Christianity and the Eth ical demands of political chemical formula.The 15th and 16th century homo focused on theologically measureabilitying the Church. legion(predicate) reformers of the time and before Machiavellis life, including the fourteenth century reformer John Wycliffe, wrote on how the papacy of the Church had grown out-of-the-way(prenominal) too powerful. During Machiavellis life St. Francis was direction the comm binglers about Jesus, and the comm acers began relating to Christ. The Church was non notwithstanding effected by the reformers and the teachings of St. Francis, and it was as well as effected by itself it was hurting itself. The church service fought against the reformers, condemning them as heretics the church was be by the words of reform. Machiavelli lived among the Christians and like any(prenominal)(prenominal) of the reformers he was seeking a reform between the Church and the State. Essentially, Machiavelli writes to prove that being a clean-living dominion a nd a person are ii steal thinkers, in the case of extreme fate and, like Luther, there are two dry lands independent of each other.Machiavelli probably wouldve been considered a think tank of his time and he believed that a principle, or anyone may publically state that they are Christians yet portray no real conviction. In the 11th chapter of The Prince Machiavelli argued that Ecclesiastical principalities were to be desired because the hoi polloi who inhabited them were governed by their own spectral laws. Machiavelli go outed these laws as tools, tools to prevent unruly citizens at heart the principalities quite an than to enforce outside rules. Machiavelli i handleizes an idea completely different from the church, that politics is something that deals with f plays and not abstracts, that it is a challenge to the notion of both Pope Gregory VII and Pope impec good dealt IIIs Divine sound to rule.3 Machiavelli realized that the divine right to rule theory is nothin g save a religious idea that does not work with the present state of man. Machiavelli alike understood that human corruption and sin is an unending problem that rulers need to deal with.Machiavelli continues by suggesting that being a moral ingester does not mean that one is a good leader as good leadership leads to order, stability, and public good. He claimed that when order, stability, and public good are imperil a ruler cannot gamble pass their actions by piety or virtue. Machiavelli believed that morality stood in the way of success, that rulers need to chance upon how to not be good, and be willing to kill. While the religious leaders adage Machiavelli as non-Christian and destructive, Machiavelli states that leaders need to accord necessary evils in efforts to maintain order and stability within their rule, that humans can be predicted through reason. The Church dictum his political agenda as wanting in Christian ethics however, his political reform lines up with Christian thinkers and with Christian ethics of generosity, compassion, and even the golden rule as we see in nonsuch Augustines and St. Benedicts writings.An initial consideration of Machiavellis thoughts on generosity, we bill sticker that he believes it is good to be considered a generous person, but that it is dangerous to do so. Although sounding contradictory to Christianity, Machiavellis debate lies in the Christian idea of doing the some good for as many people as possible. Machiavelli argues that being generous requires that the ruler imposes new ways of revenue show and therefore make his subjects hate him and lead to a guarantee that no one will think well of him.1 Machiavelli makes a similar case for compassion, in that it is fall in to be seen as cruel indeed it is to be viewed as loving, if necessary. He asserts that as the head of an army a ruler call for to be prepared to be thought cruel. The same Christian idea can be used to explain his argument as before. In the words of Star Treks Spock, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Machiavelli states that its more compassionate to impose bad weather on a few rather than make use of compassion and risk chaos to take butt.2 If we look binding to St. Augustines The City of God 4 we learn that rulers and people are dominated by their own selfish relish for power, whereas in the City of God, which Luther also makes notions of in his Doctrine of The Two Kingdoms, people go one another in charity.nether this assumption we see that men do not serve out of charity, but rather serve in a situation of do unto others as you would absorb done to yourself. Perhaps Machiavelli agreed with this view of Christianity. Machiavellis ruler never commits an act that they would not have done to themselves. I think the Machiavellian ruler loves their live as much as themselves. Machiavelli sees the political field as a billet for necessary evil. He believes, out of love, that some evil mus t take place in order to benefit the around people.Machiavelli proverb the world he lived in as a two kingdom place, like Luther and St. Augustine did. He viewed human account for what it was, not what it could be he saw people as evil and sick. Machiavellis picture of human history took into account the human equation, that we are sinful and therefore predictable, which he believes will lead to a better understanding of the future.